Update 5/7/15: Ken O’Keefe’s Update on 9/11 False Flag. Contains all the information that anyone investigating this for the first time needs to know.
Update 13/01/15: Top investigators are revealing 9-11 suppressed evidence on Israelis involved in multiple attacks. It now appears that there were several more explosions planned for 9/11 including the Georg Washington Bridge which were prevented from happening. Two men were arrested in a van full of explosives but have not been seen since their arrest:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/01/12/mapping-911-fort-lee/
Update 3/12/14:
Jim Fetzer interviews Aeronautical Engineer who confirms that no 757 hit the Pentagon as it is impossible to do so. So the missile theory and video proof is still what most probably happened :
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/12/02/911-update-more-proof-no-boeing-757-hit-the-pentagon/
Update 18/9/14:
Published on Sep 15, 2014
http://www.undergroundworldnews.com
Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World
Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day.
So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee.
http://topinfopost.com/2013/04/28/uk-man-wins-court-case-against-bbc-for-911-cover-up
—————————————–
http://youtu.be/4GY0yWXGaKs (visible explosions in WTC7 prior to collapse)
(PS the “Darth Vader sounding voice at the end is Larry “We decided to pull it” Silverstein)
Update 11/8/2014: Could the truth about 9/11 be about to be officially exposed? This compilation by Jeffrey Berwick outlines the possibilities:
The Walls are crumbling around the official 9/11 story: Why?
Update 14/7/2014:Affidavit filed by John Lear:
http://2012thebigpicture.wordpress.com/2014/07/15/hear-hear-for-john-lear-on-9-11/
Update 3/1/2012:Compelling Expert Witness Analysis – Alan Sabrosky, US Marine Corps veteran and a man with Jewish ancestry, says Israel was responsible for 9/11:
Alan Sabrosky
Update 3/8/2011: The following article relates to Video tapes of strange vans entering and leaving Twin Towers car park between August 23 and September 4, 2001, (10 nights) prior to September 11, 2001. This is new whistleblower testimony:
Whistleblower testimony
Update 19/6/2011: Interesting Australian views on 9/11 with footage I have not seen anywhere else:
Friends of Israel – Enemies Inside the Gates
Aussie Union Boss – 9/11 Deniers are Cowards
Update 25/4/2011: First Responders account of his experience at ground zero and his current illness… he states ” We were Nuked on 9/11″ First Responder’s Story
Update 19/12/2010: The following “Jesse Ventura Conspiracy Theory – 9/11 Pentagon Conspiracy ” link aired on TruTV 17 December 2010. In it Jesse Ventura interviews 9/11 Truth representative and also a witness who was one of the surviving Accountancy staff who actually walked out the “hole” caused by a “bomb/missile” with her baby, who says she thought it was a “bomb” but has been threatened by the Military “not to talk about what happened” and another witness who saw a plane fly away. So much new unreported evidence. Also the cover up of the $2.3 trillion reported by Rumsfeld as missing and unaccounted for by the Pentagon on the day before 9/11 is a plausable reason for destroying all the records in the Pentagon and 34 “expendable” lives of people just doing their jobs. There is much here to consider. Compulsory viewing, click to view :
Jesse Ventura’s Conspiracy Theory 9/11 Pentagon Conspiracy
Update 21/2/2010:
The Media Response to the Growing Influence of the 9/11 Truth Movement.
Part II: A Survey of Attitude Change in 2009-2010
by Elizabeth Woodworth
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17624
9/11 needs closure and for closure the people need the truth to be finally told of that eventful day. There are several parts to this story and all need clarification….
- The demolition style collapse of the World Trade Centre Twin Towers after impact by planes,
- The demolition style collapse of a third building near the Twin Towers later the same day,
- Flight 77 attack on the Pentagon (See new investigation report below by independent body)
- The “disappearance ” of Flight 93 over Shanksville (see Project Camelot whistleblower testimony URL: http://www.projectcamelot.org/elizabeth_nelson_flight_93.html for a very different account of this event on September 11, 2001.)
The 911 Truth Movement has been lobbying the government for disclosure of the video footage and other information which were seized on the day and have never been released, and called for another enquiry into all aspects of the events of September 11, 2001. We recommend that you watch one of the many FREE documentary movies circulating the internet that completely disprove the official US Government account of the events that took place on September 11, 2001.
Possibly the best, and certainly the most professionally produced 9/11 video documentary is the moving story 9/11: Press For Truth. This highly engaging video traces the passionate journey of a small group of grieving families who waged a tenacious battle against those who sought to bury the truth of the events surrounding that fateful day. Both a 15-minute video summary of key excerpts and the full 84-minute 9/11 video documentary can be viewed for free at the links provided below.
In 9/11: Press For Truth, six courageous 9/11 family members, including three of the famous “Jersey Girls,” tell for the first time the powerful story of how they took on the greatest powers in Washington – and won! Their tireless efforts eventually led to an investigation by the 9/11 Commission. Yet learn how the final 9/11 Commission Report then tragically failed to answer their most probing questions.
In this very well documented 9/11 video, these frustrated family members who lost loved ones on 9/11 take us on a harrowing quest as their initial explorations lead to ever deeper, more puzzling questions. What actions were taken by top government officials who received dozens of specific warnings before the attack? Was Osama Bin Laden and his top al Qaeda leadership allowed to escape from Afghanistan? What has been the reason for the deliberate obscuring of evidence for complicity of elements within government? And perhaps the most important one of all: Why, years later, are so many of the families’ questions still unanswered! Watch this landmark 9/11 video free at one of the links below.
15-minute version : 15 minutes of the best clips from 9/11 Press for Truth:
http://personalgrowthcourses.net/video/9-11_truth_documentary
Entire video: 9/11: Press for Truth can be viewed in its entirety at the link below (84 minutes):
http://www.personalgrowthcourses.net/video/9-11_video
We recommend a documentary called “Zeitgeist, The Movie” as a good place to start to explore the reasons for 9/11. URL: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-594683847743189197 It will take you a little while to view but the information is compelling.
There are many people worldwide who now believe the evidence is so overwhelming for a coverup by the US Government of the day. A group of professionals called “Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth ” banded together and put their reputations and careers on the line in an attempt to force the US Government to tell the truth about what really happened! After considerable investigation by these highly trained professionals, they concluded that the World Trade Center Twin Towers were brought down by “controlled demolition” (not by the airplanes as suggested) and the US Government at the very least knew about it and quite possibly was directly responsible for it. See their site at: http://www.ae911truth.org/
The latest independent investigation into the Pentagon attack yields alarming information. Researchers present new eyewitness testimony which they say proves the government’s story to be a “monstrous lie”. The following is a Press Release by the independent investigation:
PRLog (Press Release) – Aug 27, 2009 – A three year independent investigation into the September 11, 2001 attack on the Pentagon has yielded new eyewitness evidence which, according to the Southern California-based researchers who conducted the investigation, “conclusively (and unfortunately) establishes as a historical fact that the violence which took place in Arlington that day was not the result of a surprise attack by suicide hijackers, but rather a military black operation involving a carefully planned and skillfully executed deception.”
They have compiled the most pertinent testimony into an 81 minute video presentation entitled National Security Alert, which has earned the respect and praise of a growing number of distinguished academics, journalists, writers, entertainers, pilots, and military personnel.
The investigation involved multiple trips to the scene of the crime in Arlington, Virginia, close scrutiny of all official and unofficial data related to the event, and, most importantly, first-person interviews with dozens of eyewitnesses, many of which were conducted and filmed in the exact locations from which they witnessed the plane that allegedly struck the building that day. It was primarily conducted by two men named Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis, also known as Citizen Investigation Team, or CIT.
“There were a growing number of people in the United States and around the world who were suspicious of the government’s story about what had happened at the Pentagon that day,” Ranke explains. “The doubts were initially fueled by the dubious damage to the building, which seemed incompatible with a 757 crash, the deliberate lack of transparency by the authorities, and many other issues, but they really intensified after a team of professional pilots (Pilots for 9/11 Truth) analyzed the data obtained from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) via a Freedom of Information Act request in 2006, which was supposedly from the black box of American Airlines Flight 77, and found that the last reported altitude of the plane was far too high to have struck the light poles or the building. This meant that either the plane did not cause the observed physical damage, that the government had released fraudulent data, or both.”
“We were tired of the cover-up, but we were also frustrated with the dead-end theorizing that was taking place”, says Marquis of the project’s genesis. “We knew that the only way we were ever going to know what had really happened was if we actually went to the area, knocked on doors, and interviewed everyday people about what they saw.”
When these eyewitness accounts are aggregated, they paint a very disturbing picture, say the researchers.
“To put it as concisely as possible, the plane had to have flown on a very specific flight path in the final seconds before it reached the Pentagon in order to have caused the observed damage, starting with the light poles that were photographed on the ground and ending with the directional damage to the building itself which was outlined in detail by the American Society of Civil Engineers,” explains Ranke. “The government claims the plane flew on this flight path and hit the building. The eyewitnesses in all of the most critical vantage points, on the other hand, independently, unanimously, and unequivocally report a drastically different flight path, proving that the plane absolutely could not have hit the light poles or the building. It is a non-controversial scientific fact that a strike from this trajectory would have caused a very different damage path.”
It wasn’t just witnesses who watched the plane approach the building that the team spoke with, however.
“We’ve also published our interview with a Pentagon police officer who saw the plane flying away from the Pentagon immediately after the explosion”, says Marquis. “We already knew that the plane could not have hit based on the testimony of the witnesses on the other side of the building who watched it approach, but it was still vindicating to get this kind of confirmation.”
A 2006 Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll found that “More than a third of the American public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East.” Nevertheless, Ranke and Marquis acknowledge it is still quite controversial to claim, as they do, that “criminal elements within the U.S. government” were complicit in the attacks.
“If you are skeptical of (or even incensed by) this statement we do not blame you,” reads a note on the front page of their website, CitizenInvestigationTeam.com. “We are not asking you to take our word for it, nor do we want you to do that. We want you to view the evidence and see with your own eyes that this is the case. We want you to hear it directly from the eyewitnesses who were there, just as we did.”
Many people seem to be taking them up on this offer. Their video has already received almost 70,000 views online since it was first posted to their website a few weeks ago with only a grass roots promotional effort behind it.
Perhaps more notable than the size of the audience, however, is the caliber of some of the people in it. A newly-published compendium of endorsements on the CitizenInvestigationTeam.com website includes praise from a wide array of distinguished and well-respected Americans.
Emmy-award winning actor and former president of The Screen actors Guild, Ed Asner, calls the film a “reasoned, and methodical look at witness testimony the day the Pentagon was attacked on Sept. 11th”.
Prolific non-ficition author Dr. Peter Dale Scott, Professor Emeritus of the University of California, Berkeley affirms that the film “successfully rebuts the official account of Flight 77’s flight path on 9/11 as it approached the Pentagon”.
“If you accept the placement of the plane as independently and unanimously reported by the witnesses presented in CIT’s video National Security Alert, science proves that it did not cause the physical damage at the Pentagon on 9/11/2001”, says FAA certified pilot Robert Balsamo.
Dr. David Ray Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé and many other titles, says he is “pleased to be able to recommend this important film with enthusiasm”, while scholar, author, and radio host Dr. Kevin Barrett says that the film proves “that the official version of the attack on the Pentagon is false, and that the attack must have been a deceptive military operation, not the kamakaze crash of a hijacked commercial jet.”
Scott McKinsey, an award-winning network television director, says “The DVD offers no theorizing or speculation; only corroborated eyewitness evidence contradicting the official flight data to support an overwhelming argument that a plane did not slam into the Pentagon on 9/11”.
Architect Richard Gage, AIA, founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth.org), a coalition of over 700 professional architects and engineers calling for a new independent investigation of the destruction of the three skyscrapers in New York on 9/11 (the third was World Trade Center 7), calls the film “long overdue, but worth waiting for” and says that it “deserves serious attention”.
Retired Navy Commander and aviator James R. Compton calls National Security Alert “the best reporting I’ve seen in a long, long time” and “a must see for every citizen in our country”.
“Government and media figures who dare ignore evidence this conclusive do so at their own peril”, warns Lt. Col. Shelton Lankford, a retired Marine pilot who has flown 303 combat missions.
The full quotes from these individuals and others can be read at:
http://www.CitizenInvestigationTeam.com/praise.html
National Security Alert can be viewed for free online at http://www.CitizenInvestigationTeam.com
We have definitely not heard the end of this matter and the recent statements by Sibel Edmonds in her Deposition of 8/8/2009 (see our references for the full deposition) lend further evidence to the complicity of the US Government. We just want the truth finally.
We will update this page as new information becomes available.
All we want is the Truth
Noeline Clayfield
ASCENSION Corner... 